Thursday, March 11, 2010
   
Text Size
Login

World's First Artificial Meat Grown

Rate this item
(1 vote)
Vegetarian groups say there was 'no ethical objection' if meat was not a piece of a dead animal. Vegetarian groups say there was 'no ethical objection' if meat was not a piece of a dead animal.
Researchers in the Netherlands created what was described as soggy pork and are now investigating ways to improve the muscle tissue in the hope that people will one day want to eat it.

No one has yet tasted their produce, but it is believed the artificial meat could be on sale within five years.

Vegetarian groups welcomed the news, saying there was “no ethical objection” if meat was not a piece of a dead animal.

Mark Post, professor of physiology at Eindhoven University, told The Sunday Times: “What we have at the moment is rather like wasted muscle tissue. We need to find ways of improving it by training it and stretching it, but we will get there.

“This product will be good for the environment and will reduce animal suffering. If it feels and tastes like meat, people will buy it.

“You could take the meat from one animal and create the volume of meat previously provided by a million animals.”

The scientists extracted cells from the muscle of a live pig and then put them in a broth of other animal products. The cells then multiplied and created muscle tissue. They believe that it can be turned into something like steak if they can find a way to artificially "exercise" the muscle.

The project is backed by the Dutch government and a sausage maker and comes following the creation of artificial fish fillets from goldfish muscle cells.

Meat produced in a laboratory could reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with real animals.

Meat and dairy consumption is predicted to double by 2050 and methane from livestock is said to currently produce about 18 per cent of the world’s greenhouse gases according to UN. WorldWatch has readjusted the figure to 51%.
As far as we’re (PeTA) concerned, if meat is no longer a piece of a dead animal there’s no ethical objection.

Animal rights group Peta said: “As far as we’re concerned, if meat is no longer a piece of a dead animal there’s no ethical objection.”

However the Vegetarian Society said: “The big question is how could you guarantee you were eating artificial flesh rather than flesh from an animal that had been slaughtered.

“It would be very difficult to label and identify in a way that people would trust.”

Additional Info

2 comments

  • Comment Link Abhijit Pal Saturday, 12 December 2009 08:11 posted by Abhijit Pal

    Is it safe to eat this man made meat. May be it is safe. But this proves human hunger for meat and flesh. As it paves one way or another to get it and taste if.
    Again if it is closed to real then how a person buying meat can tell if it is not from slaughtered animal??
    Why don't people consider mushroom and tofu?? Because they have a list in which they count how many animals they have sacrificed for their hunger. Also the list should be huge as they will participate in the evil competition in which the participant should have a huge list of animal they ate okay !!!!!!!!!!!

    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
  • Comment Link Manuj Tuesday, 08 December 2009 10:05 posted by Manuj

    Nice blog...!

    This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Add comment


Quote Martial

A man can live and be healthy without killing animals for food; therefore, if he eats meat, he participates in taking animal life merely for the sake of his appetite. And to act so is immoral. - Leo Tolstoy, Russian author, War and Peace

Reset Module Positions

Login Form